Nicotine / THR - Guides for Policymakers & Advocates: Difference between revisions

Safer nicotine wiki Tobacco Harm Reduction
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Prepared the page for translation)
(Marked this version for translation)
Line 1: Line 1:
<languages/>
<languages/>
<translate>
<translate>
=Advocates=
=Advocates= <!--T:1-->






===[https://healthdiplomats.com/THR_Downloads/Tobacco_Harm_Reduction_2020.pdf Saving Lives - An Advocates Guide To Tobacco Harm Reduction]===
===[https://healthdiplomats.com/THR_Downloads/Tobacco_Harm_Reduction_2020.pdf Saving Lives - An Advocates Guide To Tobacco Harm Reduction]=== <!--T:2-->


<!--T:3-->
*Written by AHRA - Africa Harm Reduction Alliance - 2020
*Written by AHRA - Africa Harm Reduction Alliance - 2020




=Policymakers=
=Policymakers= <!--T:4-->






===[https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-tobacco-harm-reduction-nicotine-science-and-policy-q-a/ Nicotine science and policy Q & A]===
===[https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-tobacco-harm-reduction-nicotine-science-and-policy-q-a/ Nicotine science and policy Q & A]=== <!--T:5-->


<!--T:6-->
*By: Clive Bates / The counterfactual
*By: Clive Bates / The counterfactual
*"Welcome, this is my (Clive) 2020 Q & A on nicotine science and policy. It mostly focusses on nicotine vaping as an alternative to smoking, but most of the argument also applies to heated tobacco products, modern smokeless tobacco and new oral nicotine products.  It consists of about 60 questions and builds on a brief [https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-policy-rapid-questions-and-answers/ Q & A that I submitted to a consultation], a critique of an absurd [https://www.clivebates.com/world-health-organisation-fails-at-science-and-fails-at-propaganda-the-sad-case-of-whos-anti-vaping-qa/ anti-vaping Q & A by the WHO] and my [https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-risk-compared-to-smoking-challenging-false-dangerous-claim-by-stanton-glantz/ critique of numerous false and misleading claims made by Professor Stanton Glantz]."
*"Welcome, this is my (Clive) 2020 Q & A on nicotine science and policy. It mostly focusses on nicotine vaping as an alternative to smoking, but most of the argument also applies to heated tobacco products, modern smokeless tobacco and new oral nicotine products.  It consists of about 60 questions and builds on a brief [https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-policy-rapid-questions-and-answers/ Q & A that I submitted to a consultation], a critique of an absurd [https://www.clivebates.com/world-health-organisation-fails-at-science-and-fails-at-propaganda-the-sad-case-of-whos-anti-vaping-qa/ anti-vaping Q & A by the WHO] and my [https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-risk-compared-to-smoking-challenging-false-dangerous-claim-by-stanton-glantz/ critique of numerous false and misleading claims made by Professor Stanton Glantz]."
Line 21: Line 23:




===[https://t.co/Lk8XrZ6KRI?amp=1 E-CIGARETTE POLICY BRIEF:  Seven Things Policy Makers Need to Know]===
===[https://t.co/Lk8XrZ6KRI?amp=1 E-CIGARETTE POLICY BRIEF:  Seven Things Policy Makers Need to Know]=== <!--T:7-->


<!--T:8-->
*Quick 1 page guide
*Quick 1 page guide
*All references are hyperlinked to official WHO and government reports, and peer-reviewed studies
*All references are hyperlinked to official WHO and government reports, and peer-reviewed studies
Line 28: Line 31:




===[https://mailchi.mp/5165e20d33ee/trprblueprint A Blueprint for Better Regulation]===
===[https://mailchi.mp/5165e20d33ee/trprblueprint A Blueprint for Better Regulation]=== <!--T:9-->


<!--T:10-->
*Written by UKVIA - [https://www.ukvia.co.uk/ UK Vaping Industry Association] - 2021
*Written by UKVIA - [https://www.ukvia.co.uk/ UK Vaping Industry Association] - 2021






===[https://www.thr101.org/tobacco-harm-reduction-101-guideboo TOBACCO HARM REDUCTION 101: A GUIDEBOOK FOR POLICYMAKERS]===
===[https://www.thr101.org/tobacco-harm-reduction-101-guideboo TOBACCO HARM REDUCTION 101: A GUIDEBOOK FOR POLICYMAKERS]=== <!--T:11-->


<!--T:12-->
*Written by Lindsey Stroud - Webmaster of [https://www.thr101.org/ Tobacco Harm Reduction 101]
*Written by Lindsey Stroud - Webmaster of [https://www.thr101.org/ Tobacco Harm Reduction 101]


=Why=
=Why= <!--T:13-->






===[https://innco.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/INNCO-LMIC-English.pdf 10 reasons why blanket bans of e-cigarettes and HTPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are not fit for purpose]===
===[https://innco.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/INNCO-LMIC-English.pdf 10 reasons why blanket bans of e-cigarettes and HTPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are not fit for purpose]=== <!--T:14-->


<!--T:15-->
*Written by INNCO - [https://innco.org/ International Network of Nicotine Consumer Organisations] - 2021
*Written by INNCO - [https://innco.org/ International Network of Nicotine Consumer Organisations] - 2021






===[https://cei.org/studies/fear-profiteers/ Fear Profiteers: How E-cigarette Panic Benefits Health Activists]===
===[https://cei.org/studies/fear-profiteers/ Fear Profiteers: How E-cigarette Panic Benefits Health Activists]=== <!--T:16-->


<!--T:17-->
*Written by Michelle Minton - Competitive Enterprises Institute - 2018
*Written by Michelle Minton - Competitive Enterprises Institute - 2018
</translate>
</translate>

Revision as of 02:15, 20 November 2021

Other languages:

Advocates

Saving Lives - An Advocates Guide To Tobacco Harm Reduction

  • Written by AHRA - Africa Harm Reduction Alliance - 2020


Policymakers

Nicotine science and policy Q & A


E-CIGARETTE POLICY BRIEF: Seven Things Policy Makers Need to Know

  • Quick 1 page guide
  • All references are hyperlinked to official WHO and government reports, and peer-reviewed studies


A Blueprint for Better Regulation


TOBACCO HARM REDUCTION 101: A GUIDEBOOK FOR POLICYMAKERS

Why

10 reasons why blanket bans of e-cigarettes and HTPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are not fit for purpose


Fear Profiteers: How E-cigarette Panic Benefits Health Activists

  • Written by Michelle Minton - Competitive Enterprises Institute - 2018