Richardpruen (talk | contribs) (Started page for identifying poor research and taking action) |
Richardpruen (talk | contribs) (Added sections, link to information manipulation page) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Sadly papers are often published that are not of good quality, it is worth checking if there are any comments by others in the field, [https://pubpeer.com/static/about PubPeer] is a very useful way of doing this, and provides a browser extension for ( [https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/pubpeer/fmcdfigcdfkdghdklblbbpacikcchbbh Chrome], IE, Firefox) that will notify you of such comments (where it can detect the details). | Sadly papers are often published that are not of good quality, it is worth checking if there are any comments by others in the field, [https://pubpeer.com/static/about PubPeer] is a very useful way of doing this, and provides a browser extension for ( [https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/pubpeer/fmcdfigcdfkdghdklblbbpacikcchbbh Chrome], IE, Firefox) that will notify you of such comments (where it can detect the details). | ||
=== See also === | |||
For details of media and press release misconduct see: [[Information manipulation]] | |||
=== Suggestions for additions to this page === | |||
Here you may add links or information from credible sources, examples of problems ‘in the wild’ screenshots etc. for our regular page editors to address, all information must be factual and based on evidence, anything without sufficient evidence will be deleted. | |||
=== Instructions for editors of this page === | |||
{{Warnsign|Warning: Contentious subject, please would Page Authors take care to remain factual and include evidence/examples.}} | |||
=== External links === | |||
{{Stub}} | {{Stub}} | ||
[[Category:Ethics]] | |||
[[Category:Misconduct]] | |||
__FORCETOC__ | |||
edits