Current Impactful Studies: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 108: Line 108:
*note another [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2773464 paper] published 2/12 finds the exact opposite, due to differing frequency of use measures applied, ie one includes ever use as opposed to regular use.
*note another [https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2773464 paper] published 2/12 finds the exact opposite, due to differing frequency of use measures applied, ie one includes ever use as opposed to regular use.
**Despite its recent increase in popularity, e-cigarette use does not seem to be counteracting the decreases in other tobacco use prevalence.
**Despite its recent increase in popularity, e-cigarette use does not seem to be counteracting the decreases in other tobacco use prevalence.
** See also Item 1 in the table of contents
*Further analysis [https://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com/2020/12/how-federal-funding-influences-tobacco.html here] gives another explanation for the differences.
*Further analysis [https://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com/2020/12/how-federal-funding-influences-tobacco.html here] gives another explanation for the differences.
*These entries neatly summarise some of the major differences that exist in Tobacco Control, that of data interpretation. We leave it to the readers to decide which is the more plausible


==[https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2468-2667%2820%2930145-6 New Lancet Study: vaping is rare among individuals who have never smoked conventional cigarettes.]==
==[https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2468-2667%2820%2930145-6 New Lancet Study: vaping is rare among individuals who have never smoked conventional cigarettes.]==
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu