Nicotine - Stigma: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
='''Smoking (Nicotine) Stigma and the use of "Smoker"'''=
='''Smoking (Nicotine) Stigma and the use of "Smoker"'''=


=='''Publication Policies - Person-First Language'''==
=='''Publication Policies - Person-First Language (PFL)'''==


===Mentions "Smoker"===


===2023: [https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/AJPM%20Revision%20Checklist.pdf American Journal of Preventative Medicine]===
====2023: [https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/AJPM%20Revision%20Checklist.pdf American Journal of Preventative Medicine]====
*2023 AJPM Revision Guide: "Person-first language is used throughout (“people who smoke” preferred instead of “smokers”; “persons who use drugs” preferred instead of “drug users”, etc.)."
*2023 AJPM Revision Guide: "Person-first language is used throughout (“people who smoke” preferred instead of “smokers”; “persons who use drugs” preferred instead of “drug users”, etc.)."


===2023: [https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/32/2/133 New policy of people-first language to replace ‘smoker’, ‘vaper’ ‘tobacco user’ and other behaviour-based labels]===
====2023: [https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/32/2/133 New policy of people-first language to replace ‘smoker’, ‘vaper’ ‘tobacco user’ and other behaviour-based labels]====
*..."Tobacco Control is instituting a new policy of people-first language when referring to people who use tobacco and related products. Terms such as ‘smoker’, ‘vaper’ and ‘tobacco user’ (and their various iterations) should no longer be used as general descriptors."
*..."Tobacco Control is instituting a new policy of people-first language when referring to people who use tobacco and related products. Terms such as ‘smoker’, ‘vaper’ and ‘tobacco user’ (and their various iterations) should no longer be used as general descriptors."
*"However, people-first language does not invalidate how people may choose to self-identify. It provides a broader conceptualisation which reduces the potential for stigma, resists tobacco industry narratives and promotes greater precision and accuracy, as well as creating space which recognises these self-claimed identities can change."
*"However, people-first language does not invalidate how people may choose to self-identify. It provides a broader conceptualisation which reduces the potential for stigma, resists tobacco industry narratives and promotes greater precision and accuracy, as well as creating space which recognises these self-claimed identities can change."
===Over-all PFL===
====[https://www.japha.org/content/authorinfo Journal of the American Pharmacists Association (JAPhA)]====
*To the greatest extent possible, inclusive language should be used throughout the text. Authors are encouraged to use person-first language (e.g., "a person experiencing homelessness" rather than "a homeless person" or "patients with diabetes" rather than "diabetics").
====2018: [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1079063218783798 ATSA - Association for the Treatment and Prevention of Sexual Abuse]====
*Authors are encouraged to be thoughtful about the connotations of language used in their manuscripts to describe persons or groups. Person-first language (e.g., “persons with sexual offense histories”, “individual who has been adjudicated for…”, “child/adolescent with sexual behavior problems”) is generally preferred because it is often more accurate and less pejorative than terms like “sex offender”. Terms like “sex offender” imply an ongoing tendency to commit sex offenses, which is inaccurate for many persons who have been convicted for sex offenses given current sexual recidivism base rates. Similarly, the term suggests a homogeneous group defined and stigmatized on the basis of criminal behaviors that may have taken place infrequently or many years in the past.
<br>
<br>


Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu