| Line 625: | Line 625: | ||
*Response: [https://academic.oup.com/ntr/article-abstract/25/8/1511/7152888?redirectedFrom=fulltext Overlooked Inequities in Language May Undermine Progress in Tobacco Control: Further Thoughts on the Need for Reflection] | *Response: [https://academic.oup.com/ntr/article-abstract/25/8/1511/7152888?redirectedFrom=fulltext Overlooked Inequities in Language May Undermine Progress in Tobacco Control: Further Thoughts on the Need for Reflection] | ||
*Original: [https://academic.oup.com/ntr/article/24/12/1847/6710205 Time to Stop Using the Word “Smoker”: Reflecting on the Role of Language in Advancing the Field of Nicotine and Tobacco Research] | *Original: [https://academic.oup.com/ntr/article/24/12/1847/6710205 Time to Stop Using the Word “Smoker”: Reflecting on the Role of Language in Advancing the Field of Nicotine and Tobacco Research] | ||
===2021: [https://www.thinkinclusive.us/post/why-person-first-language-doesnt-always-put-the-person-first Why Person-First Language Doesn’t Always Put the Person First]=== | |||
*"Ultimately, the key is to ask, whenever possible, how a person chooses to identify, rather than making assumptions or imposing your own beliefs. Each person’s relationship to language and identity are deeply personal, and everyone’s identity choices are worthy of respect. I, who proudly chooses identity-first language and identifies as a disabled woman, am worthy of respect. Being who you choose to be – who you are – is something no language rule should ever take away." | |||
===2017: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545113/ Editorial Perspective: The use of person-first language in scholarly writing may accentuate stigma]=== | ===2017: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5545113/ Editorial Perspective: The use of person-first language in scholarly writing may accentuate stigma]=== | ||
edits