Funded Watchdogs and Counters: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The [https://tobaccotactics.org/ University of Bath Tobacco Control Group] has been discussed elsewhere. It has recently received a further boost in[[Global funding| funding]] from Bloomberg Philanthropies to fulfill a [https://exposetobacco.org/about/ STOP] campaign to the tune of $20 million. This was to enhance the self-appointed role that the University of Bath Tobacco Control group had established as Watchdog for the Tobacco Industry.  
[[File:Tobaccotactics.png|right|middle|thumb|Screen cap from twitter]]The [https://tobaccotactics.org/ University of Bath Tobacco Control Group] has been discussed elsewhere. It has recently received a further boost in[[Global funding| funding]] from Bloomberg Philanthropies to fulfill a [https://exposetobacco.org/about/ STOP] campaign to the tune of $20 million. This was to enhance the self-appointed role that the University of Bath Tobacco Control group had established as Watchdog for the Tobacco Industry.  


The exact opposite in terms of funding and content is [https://www.tctactics.org/index.php?title=Main_Page Tobacco Control Tactics] who challenge the findings and rationale of the other group. One particular perceptive and telling quotation from that entry is contained here [[File:Tobaccotactics.png|right|middle|thumb|Screen cap from twitter]]
The exact opposite in terms of funding and content is [https://www.tctactics.org/index.php?title=Main_Page Tobacco Control Tactics] who challenge the findings and rationale of the other group. One particular perceptive and telling quotation from that entry is contained to the right in a screen cap from twitter.