|
|
Line 73: |
Line 73: |
|
| |
|
| == 2020 [https://www.smokefreeworld.org/new-research-questions-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease/ https://www.smokefreeworld.org/new-research-questions-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease/]== | | == 2020 [https://www.smokefreeworld.org/new-research-questions-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease/ https://www.smokefreeworld.org/new-research-questions-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease/]== |
| | ==2019 [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30550122/ New tobacco products, a threat for tobacco control and public health of Mexico]== |
| | |
| | === 2019 [http://www.ecigarette-research.org/research/index.php/whats-new/2019/269-mexico-ecig Response to “New tobacco products, a threat for tobacco control and public health of Mexico”]=== |
| | *We read with serious concern the position article by Reynales-Shigematsu et al. about combustion-free nicotine delivery products and public health [1]. The authors not only fail to present a balanced overview of the risk-benefit ratio of these new technologies, but grossly misrepresent the existing evidence and ignore the broad consensus that Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), Alternative Nicotine Delivery Systems (ANDS), and E-Cigs (electronic cigarettes or vaporizers) use is considerably less harmful than continuation of smoking [2-6]. By placing a greater emphasis on potential risks and disregarding possible benefits the authors fail to consider that ENDS, ANDS and E-Cigs use may represent an opportunity for public health. |
| | |
| | == 2019 [https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(19)30391-5/fulltext Association of E-Cigarette Use With Respiratory Disease Among Adults: A Longitudinal Analysis]== |
| | |
| | === 2019 [http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2019/12/vapers-beware-new-study-does-not-show.html vapers beware new study does not show..... ]=== |
| | *This study is deeply flawed because it fails to consider the most likely explanation for the study findings: that people who use e-cigarettes more likely have a history of more intense smoking than people who do not use e-cigarettes. For example, one study found that while only 21% of adult smokers who did not vape were heavy smokers, 68% of adult smokers who did vape were heavy smokers (or had been heavy smokers). |
|
| |
|
| == 2019 [https://www.vapingpost.com/2019/08/07/how-regulators-misunderstand-the-toxicity-arguments-about-e-cigarettes/?fbclid=IwAR3gSdm1d9FKpU4nAg_xBCMsoDtGFfvd1aahChFsacYbC6dFS6SSiMwzPhc HowRegulators Misunderstand The Toxicity Arguments About E-Cigarettes]== | | == 2019 [https://www.vapingpost.com/2019/08/07/how-regulators-misunderstand-the-toxicity-arguments-about-e-cigarettes/?fbclid=IwAR3gSdm1d9FKpU4nAg_xBCMsoDtGFfvd1aahChFsacYbC6dFS6SSiMwzPhc HowRegulators Misunderstand The Toxicity Arguments About E-Cigarettes]== |
Line 113: |
Line 122: |
| ==To Do list== | | ==To Do list== |
| To do: | | To do: |
|
| |
| Go through this letter and the references: [http://www.ecigarette-research.org/research/index.php/whats-new/2019/269-mexico-ecig Response to “New tobacco products, a threat for tobacco control and public health of Mexico”]
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| [http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2019/12/vapers-beware-new-study-does-not-show.html http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2019/12/vapers-beware-new-study-does-not-show.html]
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| 47.[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651173 Prevalence of vaping and smoking among adolescents in Canada, England, and the United States: repeat national cross sectional surveys.][No authors listed] BMJ. 2020 Jul 10;370:m2579. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2579. No abstract available. PMID: 32651173 [PubMed] | | 47.[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651173 Prevalence of vaping and smoking among adolescents in Canada, England, and the United States: repeat national cross sectional surveys.][No authors listed] BMJ. 2020 Jul 10;370:m2579. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2579. No abstract available. PMID: 32651173 [PubMed] |