VLN Cigarette: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:08, 29 December 2020

it has been suggested these pose all the risk, while offering none of the benefits

Very-Low Nicotine Cigarettes and Non-Daily Smokers https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02228824

"These results suggest that a reduced-nicotine standard for cigarettes would reduce smoking among smokers with SMI. However, the lack of effect on total nicotine exposure indicates VLNC noncompliance, suggesting that smokers with SMI may respond to a reduced-nicotine standard by substituting alternative forms of nicotine."

Introduction: Very Low Nicotine Content (VLNC) cigarettes might be useful as part of a tobacco control strategy, but relatively little is known about their acceptability as substitutes for regular cigarettes.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 [https://academic.oup.com/ntr/article/21/Supplement_1/S38/5684952 Effects of 6-Week Use of Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Smokers With Serious Mental Illness]
+*"These results suggest that a reduced-nicotine standard for cigarettes would reduce smoking among smokers with SMI. However, the lack of effect on total nicotine exposure indicates VLNC noncompliance, suggesting that smokers with SMI may respond to a reduced-nicotine standard by substituting alternative forms of nicotine."
 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0091743520302516
 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315653995_Estimating_Demand_and_Cross-Price_Elasticity_for_Very_Low_Nicotine_Content_VLNC_Cigarettes_Using_a_Simulated_Demand_Task
+*Introduction: Very Low Nicotine Content (VLNC) cigarettes might be useful as part of a tobacco control strategy, but relatively little is known about their acceptability as substitutes for regular cigarettes.
 ==Discussion links BLOGs etc==
 [https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/353843-feds-should-think-twice-before-trying-to-reduce-nicotine-in-cigarettes Feds-should-think-twice-before-trying-to-reduce-nicotine-in-cigarettes]