Richardpruen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Richardpruen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
=Video= | =Video= | ||
{{#ev:youtube|ChtmOPFU2GI}} | {{#ev:youtube|ChtmOPFU2GI}} | ||
==Long video with evidence on vaping myths!== | ==Long video with evidence on vaping myths!== | ||
{{#ev:youtube|6RnLsS4VOk8}} | {{#ev:youtube|6RnLsS4VOk8}} | ||
| Line 99: | Line 81: | ||
==Bell jar experiment by Public Health England!== | |||
==To Do list== | |||
To do: Go through this letter and the references: [http://www.ecigarette-research.org/research/index.php/whats-new/2019/269-mexico-ecig Responseto “New tobacco products, a threat for tobacco control and publichealth of Mexico”] | To do: Go through this letter and the references: [http://www.ecigarette-research.org/research/index.php/whats-new/2019/269-mexico-ecig Responseto “New tobacco products, a threat for tobacco control and publichealth of Mexico”] | ||
| Line 138: | Line 116: | ||
===[]Need to find the bad to go with the good:=== | ===[]Need to find the bad to go with the good:=== | ||
47.[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651173 | [https://decadentvapours.com/blog/vaping-101/all-vaping-myths-debunked/ ALL Vaping Myths Debunked!] | ||
47.[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651173 Prevalence of vaping and smoking among adolescents in Canada, England, and the United States: repeat national cross sectional surveys.][No authors listed]BMJ. 2020 Jul 10;370:m2579. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2579. No abstract available.PMID: 32651173 [PubMed] | |||
| Line 148: | Line 127: | ||
[http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/study-last-thing-anti-e-cig-crusaders-want-see/?fbclid=IwAR2Q7-_6U8mgIIZbbZpLJt853ysHgNVRgCFWkVm8lxJNf3Eb3yM3bpABYy4 http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/study-last-thing-anti-e-cig-crusaders-want-see/?fbclid=IwAR2Q7-_6U8mgIIZbbZpLJt853ysHgNVRgCFWkVm8lxJNf3Eb3yM3bpABYy4] | [http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/study-last-thing-anti-e-cig-crusaders-want-see/?fbclid=IwAR2Q7-_6U8mgIIZbbZpLJt853ysHgNVRgCFWkVm8lxJNf3Eb3yM3bpABYy4 http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/study-last-thing-anti-e-cig-crusaders-want-see/?fbclid=IwAR2Q7-_6U8mgIIZbbZpLJt853ysHgNVRgCFWkVm8lxJNf3Eb3yM3bpABYy4] | ||
* The Roswell Park findings run counter to what lead author of a University of California, San Diego (UCSD) study, Jessica Wang-Rodriguez, told[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3377730/E-cigarettes-NO-better-regular-smoking-Toxins-devices-cause-cancer-nicotine-FREE.html ][https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3377730/E-cigarettes-NO-better-regular-smoking-Toxins-devices-cause-cancer-nicotine-FREE.html The Daily Mail]in December. Wang-Rodriguez said “I believe they are no better than smoking regular cigarettes.” That study was published in the journal[http://www.oraloncology.com/article/S1368-8375(15)00362-0/fulltext ][http://www.oraloncology.com/article/S1368-8375(15)00362-0/fulltext Oral Oncology]. | * The Roswell Park findings run counter to what lead author of a University of California, San Diego (UCSD) study, Jessica Wang-Rodriguez, told[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3377730/E-cigarettes-NO-better-regular-smoking-Toxins-devices-cause-cancer-nicotine-FREE.html ][https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3377730/E-cigarettes-NO-better-regular-smoking-Toxins-devices-cause-cancer-nicotine-FREE.html The Daily Mail]in December. Wang-Rodriguez said “I believe they are no better than smoking regular cigarettes.” That study was published in the journal[http://www.oraloncology.com/article/S1368-8375(15)00362-0/fulltext ][http://www.oraloncology.com/article/S1368-8375(15)00362-0/fulltext Oral Oncology]. | ||
* The DCNF[https://dailycaller.com/2015/12/29/media-are-distorting-dubious-study-claiming-e-cigarettes-can-cause-cancer/ ][https://dailycaller.com/2015/12/29/media-are-distorting-dubious-study-claiming-e-cigarettes-can-cause-cancer/ reported] in December that not only were the cells used in the UCSD study “not completely comparable to cells within a living person,” but the dosage was comparable to someone smoking “for hours on end,” so it wasn’t representative of real world e-cig use. Further, the cell cultures already had “[http://www.cancercenter.com/skin-cancer/types/tab/squamous-cell-carcinoma/?source=GGLPS01&channel=paid+search&invsrc=Non_Branded_Paid_Search_Google_Cancer_Search&utm_device=c&utm_budget=Corporate&utm_site=GOOGLE&utm_campaign=Non+Brand%3ECancer+Type%3A+Skin&utm_adgroup=Types%3ESquamous+Cell+Carcinoma%3EExact&utm_term=squamous+cell+carcinoma&utm_matchtype=e&k_clickid=092e99b7-6429-4c3e-b19f-b7c6226e91fe&k_profid=422&k_kwid=406118 squamous cell carcinoma],” meaning the cells already had cancer. | * The DCNF[https://dailycaller.com/2015/12/29/media-are-distorting-dubious-study-claiming-e-cigarettes-can-cause-cancer/ ][https://dailycaller.com/2015/12/29/media-are-distorting-dubious-study-claiming-e-cigarettes-can-cause-cancer/ reported] in December that not only were the cells used in the UCSD study “not completely comparable to cells within a living person,” but the dosage was comparable to someone smoking “for hours on end,” so it wasn’t representative of real world e-cig use. Further, the cell cultures already had “[http://www.cancercenter.com/skin-cancer/types/tab/squamous-cell-carcinoma/?source=GGLPS01&channel=paid+search&invsrc=Non_Branded_Paid_Search_Google_Cancer_Search&utm_device=c&utm_budget=Corporate&utm_site=GOOGLE&utm_campaign=Non+Brand%3ECancer+Type%3A+Skin&utm_adgroup=Types%3ESquamous+Cell+Carcinoma%3EExact&utm_term=squamous+cell+carcinoma&utm_matchtype=e&k_clickid=092e99b7-6429-4c3e-b19f-b7c6226e91fe&k_profid=422&k_kwid=406118 squamous cell carcinoma],” meaning the cells already had cancer. | ||
edits