Funded Watchdogs and Counters: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Richardpruen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Richardpruen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The exact opposite in terms of funding and content is [https://www.tctactics.org/index.php?title=Main_Page Tobacco Control Tactics] who challenge the findings and rationale of the other group. One particular perceptive and telling quotation from that entry is contained here | The exact opposite in terms of funding and content is [https://www.tctactics.org/index.php?title=Main_Page Tobacco Control Tactics] who challenge the findings and rationale of the other group. One particular perceptive and telling quotation from that entry is contained here | ||
[[File:Tobaccotactics.png|right|middle|thumb|Screen cap from twitter]] | [[File:Tobaccotactics.png|right|middle|thumb|Screen cap from twitter]] | ||
Revision as of 20:59, 13 December 2020
The University of Bath Tobacco Control Group has been discussed elsewhere. It has recently received a further boost in funding from Bloomberg Philanthropies to fulfill a STOP campaign to the tune of $20 million. This was to enhance the self-appointed role that the University of Bath Tobacco Control group had established as Watchdog for the Tobacco Industry.
The exact opposite in terms of funding and content is Tobacco Control Tactics who challenge the findings and rationale of the other group. One particular perceptive and telling quotation from that entry is contained here
