THR X Community Notes: Difference between revisions

Safer nicotine wiki Tobacco Harm Reduction
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Started page)
 
m (→‎THR-CommunityNotes: Italics and lowercase for 'would'.)
Line 12: Line 12:
Please vote for posts you see in the group.  
Please vote for posts you see in the group.  


If you feel any note is unworthy of an upvote, let the group know what you think WOULD be a worthy note.
If you feel any note is unworthy of an upvote, let the group know what you think ''would'' be a worthy note.


A CN member notes ".. it’s worth putting votes on unrelated content because if we’re all voting the same way on the exact same content all the time we’ll possibly start cancelling each others votes out".
A CN member notes ".. it’s worth putting votes on unrelated content because if we’re all voting the same way on the exact same content all the time we’ll possibly start cancelling each others votes out".

Revision as of 12:17, 6 December 2023

THR Community notes icon
THR Community notes icon

THR-CommunityNotes

The THR-CommunityNotes Twitter (X..) group is aimed at getting Community Notes related to Tobacco Harm Reduction (vape, snus, HTP, pouches, lozenges, toothpicks etc.) raised, voted on and visible against fake facts and disinformation spread by mainstream media and other large entities (e.g. governments and their agencies, WHO).

Some Community Notes (CN) contributors in the group can raise notes. If you raise a note, please share the link here so other CN contributors can vote it up.

Ability to raise notes is only available to CN contributors after a certain (vaguely defined) time or achievement has been made. Before then, you can vote on notes raised by others. I've been told it's best to only select 2-3 of the reasons they cite as being in support of a note.

Please vote for posts you see in the group.

If you feel any note is unworthy of an upvote, let the group know what you think would be a worthy note.

A CN member notes ".. it’s worth putting votes on unrelated content because if we’re all voting the same way on the exact same content all the time we’ll possibly start cancelling each others votes out".

Some folks are here, despite not even being eligible to become CN contributors (it takes some special requirements, and offering up some personal contact info), because they're so good at debunking the heaping piles of manure that pass for 'health information' that they can be valuable in identifying instances in need of notes, and sometime even suggest the perfect text and link(s) for the note.

We can use this private space to hash out the details of the specific tweets to deal with, the details of the note, get them out there and (hopefully) get our Notes made public.

Peeps in the first listed groups, please also do what is suggested of any later groups.