Stanton Glantz: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Added section: Reactions To His Research
No edit summary
(Added section: Reactions To His Research)
Line 45: Line 45:
In 2018, a second former employee filed a sexual-harassment lawsuit against Glantz; the University of California and Glantz denied these allegations as well.<ref name="sf-examiner"/>
In 2018, a second former employee filed a sexual-harassment lawsuit against Glantz; the University of California and Glantz denied these allegations as well.<ref name="sf-examiner"/>


=other info=
=Reactions To His Research=
 
==2020 Brad Rodu: [https://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com/2020/02/federal-funds-misspent-on-anti-vaping.html Federal Funds Misspent on Anti-Vaping Research]==
*References retracted paper in the Journal of the American Heart Association submitted by Bhatta and Glantz.
*This prohibitionist mission supports thousands of NIH-funded researchers, and cows countless more into silence when they could be producing life-saving harm reduction data and analyses.
 
=Other info=


[[File:E2E26170-B713-41CA-A370-BBA293A08F57.jpg|thumb|Stan promises to eat his shoe!]]
[[File:E2E26170-B713-41CA-A370-BBA293A08F57.jpg|thumb|Stan promises to eat his shoe!]]
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu