Myth Busting: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:
* Given these issues, the editors are concerned that the study conclusion is unreliable.
* Given these issues, the editors are concerned that the study conclusion is unreliable.
* The editors hereby retract the article from publication in Journal of the American Heart Association
* The editors hereby retract the article from publication in Journal of the American Heart Association
: News items regarding the retraction
: [https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/02/20/nyu-scientists-others-call-taxpayer-funded-ucsf-vaping-study-probe/4805323002/ nyu scientists and others call for taxpayer funded ucsf vaping study probe]
: [https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2019/07/17/vaping-heart-attacks-false-claims-sexual-harassment-allegations/1676473001/ Study linking vaping to heart attacks muddied amid spat between two tobacco researchers]
: [https://vaping360.com/vape-news/88729/journal-retracts-unreliable-glantz-study-tying-vaping-to-heart-attacks/ Journal Retracts "Unreliable" Glantz Study Tying Vaping to Heart Attacks]


= ENDS - Youth=
= ENDS - Youth=
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu