Richardpruen (talk | contribs) |
Richardpruen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
== 2020 [https://www.smokefreeworld.org/new-research-questions-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease/ https://www.smokefreeworld.org/new-research-questions-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease/]== | == 2020 [https://www.smokefreeworld.org/new-research-questions-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease/ https://www.smokefreeworld.org/new-research-questions-link-between-e-cigarettes-and-respiratory-disease/]== | ||
==2019 [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30550122/ New tobacco products, a threat for tobacco control and public health of Mexico]== | |||
=== 2019 [http://www.ecigarette-research.org/research/index.php/whats-new/2019/269-mexico-ecig Response to “New tobacco products, a threat for tobacco control and public health of Mexico”]=== | |||
*We read with serious concern the position article by Reynales-Shigematsu et al. about combustion-free nicotine delivery products and public health [1]. The authors not only fail to present a balanced overview of the risk-benefit ratio of these new technologies, but grossly misrepresent the existing evidence and ignore the broad consensus that Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), Alternative Nicotine Delivery Systems (ANDS), and E-Cigs (electronic cigarettes or vaporizers) use is considerably less harmful than continuation of smoking [2-6]. By placing a greater emphasis on potential risks and disregarding possible benefits the authors fail to consider that ENDS, ANDS and E-Cigs use may represent an opportunity for public health. | |||
== 2019 [https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(19)30391-5/fulltext Association of E-Cigarette Use With Respiratory Disease Among Adults: A Longitudinal Analysis]== | |||
=== 2019 [http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2019/12/vapers-beware-new-study-does-not-show.html vapers beware new study does not show..... ]=== | |||
*This study is deeply flawed because it fails to consider the most likely explanation for the study findings: that people who use e-cigarettes more likely have a history of more intense smoking than people who do not use e-cigarettes. For example, one study found that while only 21% of adult smokers who did not vape were heavy smokers, 68% of adult smokers who did vape were heavy smokers (or had been heavy smokers). | |||
== 2019 [https://www.vapingpost.com/2019/08/07/how-regulators-misunderstand-the-toxicity-arguments-about-e-cigarettes/?fbclid=IwAR3gSdm1d9FKpU4nAg_xBCMsoDtGFfvd1aahChFsacYbC6dFS6SSiMwzPhc HowRegulators Misunderstand The Toxicity Arguments About E-Cigarettes]== | == 2019 [https://www.vapingpost.com/2019/08/07/how-regulators-misunderstand-the-toxicity-arguments-about-e-cigarettes/?fbclid=IwAR3gSdm1d9FKpU4nAg_xBCMsoDtGFfvd1aahChFsacYbC6dFS6SSiMwzPhc HowRegulators Misunderstand The Toxicity Arguments About E-Cigarettes]== | ||
| Line 113: | Line 122: | ||
==To Do list== | ==To Do list== | ||
To do: | To do: | ||
47.[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651173 Prevalence of vaping and smoking among adolescents in Canada, England, and the United States: repeat national cross sectional surveys.][No authors listed] BMJ. 2020 Jul 10;370:m2579. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2579. No abstract available. PMID: 32651173 [PubMed] | 47.[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651173 Prevalence of vaping and smoking among adolescents in Canada, England, and the United States: repeat national cross sectional surveys.][No authors listed] BMJ. 2020 Jul 10;370:m2579. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2579. No abstract available. PMID: 32651173 [PubMed] | ||
edits