|
|
| Line 134: |
Line 134: |
| ==To Do list== | | ==To Do list== |
| To do: | | To do: |
|
| |
| 47.[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651173 Prevalence of vaping and smoking among adolescents in Canada, England, and the United States: repeat national cross sectional surveys.][No authors listed] BMJ. 2020 Jul 10;370:m2579. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2579. No abstract available. PMID: 32651173 [PubMed]
| |
|
| |
| [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?linkname=pubmed_pubmed&from_uid=32651173 Similar articles]
| |
|
| |
| [http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/study-last-thing-anti-e-cig-crusaders-want-see/?fbclid=IwAR2Q7-_6U8mgIIZbbZpLJt853ysHgNVRgCFWkVm8lxJNf3Eb3yM3bpABYy4 http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/study-last-thing-anti-e-cig-crusaders-want-see/?fbclid=IwAR2Q7-_6U8mgIIZbbZpLJt853ysHgNVRgCFWkVm8lxJNf3Eb3yM3bpABYy4]
| |
|
| |
| * The Roswell Park findings run counter to what lead author of a University of California, San Diego (UCSD) study, Jessica Wang-Rodriguez, told[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3377730/E-cigarettes-NO-better-regular-smoking-Toxins-devices-cause-cancer-nicotine-FREE.html ][https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3377730/E-cigarettes-NO-better-regular-smoking-Toxins-devices-cause-cancer-nicotine-FREE.html The Daily Mail]in December. Wang-Rodriguez said “I believe they are no better than smoking regular cigarettes.” That study was published in the journal[http://www.oraloncology.com/article/S1368-8375(15)00362-0/fulltext ][http://www.oraloncology.com/article/S1368-8375(15)00362-0/fulltext Oral Oncology].
| |
| * The DCNF[https://dailycaller.com/2015/12/29/media-are-distorting-dubious-study-claiming-e-cigarettes-can-cause-cancer/ ][https://dailycaller.com/2015/12/29/media-are-distorting-dubious-study-claiming-e-cigarettes-can-cause-cancer/ reported] in December that not only were the cells used in the UCSD study “not completely comparable to cells within a living person,” but the dosage was comparable to someone smoking “for hours on end,” so it wasn’t representative of real world e-cig use. Further, the cell cultures already had “[http://www.cancercenter.com/skin-cancer/types/tab/squamous-cell-carcinoma/?source=GGLPS01&channel=paid+search&invsrc=Non_Branded_Paid_Search_Google_Cancer_Search&utm_device=c&utm_budget=Corporate&utm_site=GOOGLE&utm_campaign=Non+Brand%3ECancer+Type%3A+Skin&utm_adgroup=Types%3ESquamous+Cell+Carcinoma%3EExact&utm_term=squamous+cell+carcinoma&utm_matchtype=e&k_clickid=092e99b7-6429-4c3e-b19f-b7c6226e91fe&k_profid=422&k_kwid=406118 squamous cell carcinoma],” meaning the cells already had cancer.
| |
| * “All this study is highlighting is the fact that exposing already cancerous cells to cigarette smoke, nicotine or vapor may accelerate cell death, but of course, only if you swim in it,” Paul Barnes of Facts Do Matter told TheDCNF in December.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369220307546?dgcid=author VapingNicotine Is Far Less Harmful Than Smoking Tobacco] | | [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369220307546?dgcid=author VapingNicotine Is Far Less Harmful Than Smoking Tobacco] |